contact the doctor          regress


TOUCH OF EVIL

Written/directed by Orson Welles; re-edited by Rick Schmidlin and Walter Murch;

After the triumph of Citizen Kane in l94l, Orson Welles' career floundered as the former wunderkind morphed into a perennial Peck's bad boy. The Hollywood establishment found the style and content of films like The Lady From Shanghai (l948) increasingly problematic. Welles' imperious and erratic character further compounded his difficulties with the system. Touch of Evil, written and directed in l958, was touted as his comeback movie. Supposedly, it would be the first in a five picture deal with Universal Studios.

It's likely that Universal executives assumed that a chastened Welles would create a routine crime drama with an entertaining salting of the master's touch. Instead, he delivered a hellish excursion through a extravagantly decadent Mexican bordertown milieu. Here, indeed, was William Carlos William's 'ischio-rectal fossa of mankind': a locale foully stained with lust and greed and racial prejudice, the latter an issue which still lay uncomfortably outside the provenance of most mainstream Fifties movies. Welles' telling of his tale was deemed idiosyncratic as its content -- particularly the rapid crosscutting between parallel plot lines.

Welles displayed his typical restlessness upon a project's completion by immediately flying off to Mexico, where he began to film Don Quixote (it would never be finished). Behind his back, studio apparatchiks hastily cut his work to their own meagre measure; shooting new scenes, clumsily re-editing others. Touch of Evil  subsequently opened to mixed reviews, then quickly vanished.

Within a few years, it would be hailed as a subversive masterpiece. Its substance and style went on to inspire a legion of directors, from the French New Wave -- notably Francois Truffaut and Jean-Luc Godard -- to American filmmakers as recently as Curtis Hanson (Hanson states that LA Confidential [l997] was strongly influenced by Touch of Evil). But Welles himself never directed a Hollywood picture again. His subsequent tragi-comic journey had him hawking jug wine, booming portentous voiceovers, acting in often inferior films to cobble together funding for flawed, but brilliant attempts to rise from his own ashes, e.g., The Trial (l963) and Chimes at Midnight (l967).

Welles did get to view Universal's version of Touch of Evil prior to its release. He promptly fired off a 58 page memo to the studio explaining in detail how his central concepts could be restored to the satisfaction of all concerned. His graceful, well- reasoned pleadings went utterly unheeded. But the memo survived, as well as pristine prints of Welles' original footage. Now, using cutting edge technology, a dedicated Universal team headed by Rick Schmidlin and Walter Murch, assisted by Welles scholar Jonathan Rosenbaum, has re-edited Touch of Evil, following Welles' instructions to the letter. Forty years after the fact, we can finally see the picture the great auteur wanted us to see.

The mainspring of Welles' screenplay, adapted from a second string potboiler by Whit Masterson, is the demolition of small time bigshot Rudy Linnekar and his current bimbo, moments after Linnaker drives across the border between the seedy Mexican town of Los Robles and its unnamed American counterpart (the locale Welles used for both was Venice, California, in its down-and-out pre-hippie days).

Touch of Evil's famous introduction, from the furtive planting of a bomb in Linnekar's car to its detonation, lasts three minutes and forty seconds. The sequence unspools in one astonishing take: Welles' mobile camera slithers through streets crooked as his characters' motivations, effortlessly swooping and diving as it tracks the doomed couple. Along the way, one glimpses another couple, walking hand in hand: Mike Vargas, an elite Mexican narcotics cop (Charleton Heston, his familiar craggy attractiveness rendered obscurely unsettling by swarthy makeup, black hair and moustache), and his new American bride Suzy (Janet Leigh of the alarming bosom; cherry-pie fresh, ripe for victimization, Leigh's Suzy uncannily foreshadows her role as the doomed Marion Crane in Hitchcock's Psycho (l96O) two years later).  

The titles which formerly obscured Welles' magisterial establishing sequence have been removed by the re-edit, so that one fully savors the first impact of Welles' sleazy, oddly seductive bordertown mise-en-scene. Henri Mancini's idiomatic score has been carefully pared down, permitting one to hear the director's signature deployment of cunningly overlapped dialogue and relevant ambient sound -- e.g, the tinny country music playing on the car radio, which obscures the bomb's ominous tick-tock.

Vargas has just incarcerated a powerful member of the Grandi crime family in Mexico. In the midst of his honeymoon, he insists on leaving Suzy to join the investigation into Linnekar's murder on the American side -- "because it looks bad for us". The naieve Suzy is easily conned into a meeting with boss Uncle Joe Grandi himself (vintage Hollywood's all-purpose ethnic, Akim Tamiroff, in an Edward G. Robinson sendup no less menacing for its patent absurdity). Grandi implies that Vargas' nosing around his family's dirty business will put her husband and Suzy in harm's way. The implicit racism of her dismissal -- she calls him a "greasy little man" -- sorts as oddly with her Mexican marriage as her earlier reference to Uncle Joe's nephew/messenger as "Pancho".

Enter Chief Detective Hank Quinlan (Orson Welles), an ex-alcoholic, foul-mouthed, unkempt, limping hulk, still haunted by his wife's violent death long ago. He's become a local celebrity for solving a string of murders with the help of his devoted sidekick Pete Menzies (Joseph Calleia's poignant performance as Menzies led one critic to muse that the film's truest love is that which binds the two cops). Quinlin bristles with suspicion; growls bigoted barbs at Vargas; then quickly proclaims that the killer is a frightened young Mexican shoe-clerk who is the lover of Linnekar's daughter. At the youth's apartment Menzies discovers dynamite in a shoebox; announces proudly that Quinlan has once again found his man. But minutes before Vargas himself had discovered the same box, empty.

Vargas eventually winkles out the secret of Quinlan's successes -- vital evidence planted without Menzies's knowledge. Meanwhile, Suzy is kidnapped by Uncle Joe's hoodlums in a scheme to indite her as a degenerate addict, and implicate Vargas as a dope dealer. Quinlan strikes a devil's bargain with Uncle Joe, supposedly in aid of both smashing Vargas. He then strangles the crime boss in the tawdry motel room where Suzy lies drugged, to make it appear that Vargas killed Uncle Joe over turf or wife or both. Quinlan is ultimately unmasked and killed. Vargas and Suzy, still dazed from her ordeal, are united. The clerk's confession that he did blow up Linneaker is tossed to the viewer as a troubling afterthought: ironically, Quinlan's original suspicions on that score were absolutely correct...

In their hapless efforts to address what they saw as a need for greater clarity in Touch of Evil's labybrinthine plot, Universal's henchmen largely succeeded at unhitching the parallel narrative streams of Vargas' sleuthing after Quinlan's iniquities, and Suzy's abduction. As a result, the studio's version registers as more static, and is frequently confusing. Re-establishing Welles' intricate cross-cuts between the two story lines accelerates the film's momentum and energizes one's apprehensive alertness, setting the stage even more adroitly for a climax which is as extraordinary as the reknowned opening.

Welles' finale elegantly reprises the vertiginous crane and dolly camera movements of Linnekar's murder. Wearing a wire provided by Vargas, the disillusioned, heartbroken Menzies walks with his erstwhile mentor through a surreal blasted landscape of oil derricks (similar locales have backgrounded two subsequent generations of action thrillers). Vargas desparately stumbles around, behind, and below the pair with an inadequate receiving device, seeking to capture Quinlan's confession.

The despoiled terrain specifically invokes Quinlan's befouled moral condition, but also speaks to the general state of corruption prevailing in Welles' Hobbesian universe, ridden with rapacity and rancid capitalist greed. Here and elsewhere one is struck by the director's affinity for the themes and means of early Twentieth century European Expressionist art (e.g. Grosz, Klimt, Schiele) and cinema (e.g. The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari [l9l9], M [l93l]) . Touch of Evil's subject matter, its intense chiaroscuro, skewed camera angles, grotesque physical distortions -- all resonate with the Expressionists' nostalgia for the gutter; with their sinister insinuations of unruly aggression and transgressive sexuality (the re-edit undoes the studio's suppression of Welles' clear inference that Suzy has been raped as well as drugged by Grandi's goons. 

An oneiric irrationality, emblematic of much European Expressionist art and previous Hollywood film noirs (many created by emigree directors), pervades Touch of Evil. It is, for instance, utterly absurd that Vargas should pursue racket busting and newly wedded bliss at the same time, and in the same dangerous milieu. Vargas repeatedly attempts to rescue Suzy, even as he persistently exposes her to ever more profound degradation and mortal risk. The logic reconciling such glaring contradictions resides in the unconscious. It's often revealed in the dreamwork -- which Touch of Evil evokes more powerfully than any noir effort, before or since.

Freud portrayed the oneiric realm as a kingdom of misrule where the id threatens to reign supreme, and the unconscious thrives upon forbidden desire and debauched motivation. In the Freudian andere lokalitat -- the "other place" -- of Los Robles, Welles strips bare the heroic Vargas' repressed dark side.

It's in this nightmare world where one may discern Vargas' disavowed violent proclivities, projected upon the unremittingly evil Grandis; Vargas' consciously disavowed prejudice against Anglos; Vargas' latent mysogeny and an attendant fear of the feminine redeemed by exuberant rape fantasies; all fomented by the presence of Suzy -- his delectable, disturbing exogamous object choice, with her airy, country-club racism.

Welles also mocks the irrationality of many a Hollywood happy ending even while staging one. Mike and Suzy's terminal reunion is so hectically conjured up as to seduce the viewer into denying the scarifying traumata visited upon her, which Vargas' patent derelictions have facilitated. In real life, his wife would probably be plunged into a profound post-traumatic disorder; and doubtless bear her husband enormous, perhaps unhealable anger.

Touch of Evil's cast of minor characters is compelling as its leads, including a klatch of Welles' cronies in trenchant cameos. As Quinlan's past Spanish whorehouse love, decked out in frightwig and garish makeup, an almost unrecognizeable Marlene Dietrich deflates Quinlan's beery nostalgia with one of the most famous anti-romantic ripostes in film history: "You ought to stay away from those candy bars, honey -- you a mess..."

Quinlan is a mess indeed, perversely splendid in his utter ruin. One speculates that his creator was no stranger to his debased anti-hero's struggle between light and dark, order and chaos, rule and misrule. Welles epitomized that struggle in Touch of Evil's milieu, and in the literal mortification of his own person. The director bloated his face, swelled his body into an obese parody of his corpulent, but still handsome self. Eerily anticipating the gargantuan wreckage of his subsequent decline and fall, he became what he beheld.

 

CONTACT THE DOCTOR          REGRESS